Unprecedented Shake-Up: Immigration Judges Dismissed Amid Controversy
What caught attention wasn’t just the number of firings — it was how they happened. Several dismissed judges reported receiving identical emails within a five-minute window, all from an unlisted internal address that no one claimed.
One former staffer remarked quietly, “That account shouldn’t exist,” leaving observers wondering who was truly orchestrating the purge behind the scenes.
A Broad Restructuring
According to El País, the Trump administration removed roughly 50 immigration judges and encouraged another 50 to retire or accept new assignments.
The stated goal: accelerate case processing and reduce a backlog of 3 million cases. The dismissals were communicated through brief, impersonal emails, reflecting a wider effort to restructure the immigration court system.
Reactions and Allegations
Several judges claim they were targeted for their rulings. Jennifer Peyton called her removal politically motivated, while former judge Carla Espinoza accused the administration of discriminatory practices after her contract expired.
Senator Dick Durbin described the actions as a “clear abuse of power,” and the National Association of Immigration Judges warned of plummeting morale and widespread fear among members.
Officials, however, deny any political agenda, insisting the shake-up aims to improve “efficiency, performance, and public trust.” Supporters argue it was necessary, saying, “We’re done letting activist judges block border enforcement.”
⭐
Conclusion
The sweeping removal of immigration judges has sparked a broader debate about the balance between judicial independence, efficiency, and political influence. Whether seen as essential reform or a politically driven purge, the move has transformed the immigration court system overnight — leaving both critics and supporters watching closely to see how the restructuring will unfold.